


IanCutress: We've known it's been two rotated dies for a long while.It would be interesting to see direct performance comparisons between high end IPS laptop panels and mid-end PVA/IPS desktop screens, to see just how good/bad these high-end laptop screens are, and whether they're worth the extra 600$, if you mostly use the machine at a desk, or if the same money buys a vastly superior dedicated screen. If you compare the dream color offering to NEC and eizo offerings, you will see that it is priced for a certain market.
#Hp elitebook workstation 8760w i5 upgrade
#Hp elitebook workstation 8760w i5 pro
If you agree or disagree on its inclusion, or have another workstation-class benchmark to suggest, please sound off in our comments.Īdobe Premiere Pro unsurprisingly favors as much CPU power as you can throw at it, and as a result the quad-core systems can't really compete with an i7-990X. Our third benchmark is Premiere Pro Benchmark for CS5 (run in CS5.5 without issue), and as I mentioned in my review of HP's Z210 SFF desktop, I'm still not 100% sold on this benchmark. SPECapc for Lightwave 3D 9.6 shows more excellent results for the HP EliteBook 8760w and proves it's more than capable of offering adequate performance for users who need a mobile workstation.

The 5010M is in fact likely to be as fast as or faster than any desktop Quadro currently offered on NewEgg. That's fair: the 5010M boasts twice as many CUDA cores as the Quadro 2000 and four times as many as the Quadro 600, more than making up any performance deficit resulting from the faster processors in the desktop workstations. In SPECviewperf 11, the 8760w's Quadro 5010M comes into its own and runs roughshod over the other cards. Note that for these our only reference points are desktops as we get more mobile workstations in we'll be able to improve the amount of data we have to the point where we can eventually split these off into mobile and desktop charts. Since we're working with a mobile workstation in the HP EliteBook 8760w, it's worth testing it in workstation-based performance metrics.
